Exetools

Exetools (https://forum.exetools.com/index.php)
-   General Discussion (https://forum.exetools.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   best obfuscator for .net software (https://forum.exetools.com/showthread.php?t=12839)

mafcin 06-08-2010 04:19

best obfuscator for .net software
 
simple question - which obfuscator is the best to protect .net software?

i tried a lot of them and finally i didnt found a good one....

i know that .net software cant be protected in 100% but i want to know which one is the hardest to crack... ;)

regards

DARKER 06-08-2010 14:32

Nice feature has Salamander .NET protector:
"... it converts the decompilable Microsoft Intermediate Language code (MSIL or CIL) of your assemblies into native format ...."

We investigate some target but i can't say it's really secure ... (Maybe wrong implementation)
Code:

http://www.remotesoft.com/salamander/protector.html

mafcin 06-09-2010 21:08

hmm...
i'll try it

i've been using eziriz that represents absolutely no protection... and now i use 9rays obfuscator... i'm going to compare it with salamander... :)

Kurapica 06-10-2010 04:06

use SmartAssembly ver 4.0 or above.

salamander is crap.

mafcin 06-11-2010 05:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kurapica (Post 68422)
use SmartAssembly ver 4.0 or above.

salamander is crap.

i found SmartAssembly yesterday and i was pleasantly surprised when i tried to do anything with protected file... obfuscated code is invisible and for now i dont know how to deobfuscate it, but still trying :)

i dont know whether you know, but a new version has been released two days ago - i didnt use it yet but i want to know what's new, so probably i'll check it tommorow :)

dedificator 06-14-2010 22:58

[QUOTE=mafcin;68428]i found SmartAssembly yesterday and i was pleasantly surprised when i tried to do anything with protected file... obfuscated code is invisible and for now i dont know how to deobfuscate it, but still trying :)

First of all, remove second <Modules> table entry (usually empty), if one is present... (open file with CFF explorer).

tonyweb 06-15-2010 02:18

I fully quote Kurapica ... Salamander (at least version 3.5 I saw) seems to be a bluff :P

Regards,
Tony

congviet 06-29-2010 23:30

it depends on the level of cracker, with a good cracker can bypass protect.

congviet 06-30-2010 08:51

Codewall 2010 v4.0 also a tool to protect .NET applications is very good.
Quote:

http://www.codewall.net/default.aspx

Kurapica 06-30-2010 17:56

cheap tricks !

it takes us back to 2004 or even before :S

this is just my humble opinion.

bball0002 07-08-2010 23:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by congviet (Post 68602)
Codewall 2010 v4.0 also a tool to protect .NET applications is very good.

Are you a Codewall developer? Protection is worse than Reactor or Salamander. I cracked all versions of this protector, including 4.0.


On-Topic, just go with a good obfuscator like {SmartAssembly}. Most of the JIT hooking protectors don't have very good obfuscation, so once you get the IL code back it's not a hard process to crack the exe.

mafcin 07-24-2010 03:44

what do u think about that software: http://lukesw.net/apps/ProtectorLite.aspx
it's a little obfuscator made by polish student... it's not very popular and it's free for all :)

WhoCares 07-26-2010 12:28

http://www.dnguard.net/

mafcin 08-06-2010 05:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhoCares (Post 68864)
http://www.dnguard.net/

this is infected by a virus - dont try to install this - scanned by latest versions of ESET NOD32 and Kaspersky Internet Security 2011

bball0002 08-07-2010 00:29

lol... no it's not. I've used that software before. It's clean. Maybe VmProtect causes the false-positive?


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 20:19.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX