Thread: mupack
View Single Post
  #6  
Old 11-11-2015, 06:23
mudlord's Avatar
mudlord mudlord is offline
Family
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 83
Rept. Given: 11
Rept. Rcvd 69 Times in 25 Posts
Thanks Given: 37
Thanks Rcvd at 190 Times in 50 Posts
mudlord Reputation: 69
Yeah, my private builds focus on compression ratio, using completely different compression algorithms. I designed it to be easy to depack. Figured theres no point in trying protection since people will crack it anyway. The public build is there so there is no real loss if people misuse it, although there might still be a possibility of that happening. Pity the taggant scheme for packers is a crock of sh*t. (only useful for commercial stuff, not freeware) And digital signatures do nothing too.

Plus, many packers like ASPack, PESpin and mpress seem to miss crucial things like proper TLS callback support. I guess now I need to work out overlay support, and fully reentrant DLL entry points. (so it doesn't needlessly depack itself over and over)

Atm I am trying to debug a nice (as in, interesting and hard) test case with DLLs with TLS. For some reason there is one flaw there, but other DLLs with TLS callbacks work fine. Dunno if its something to do with reentrancy though.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Gave Reputation+1 to mudlord For This Useful Post:
mr.exodia (11-12-2015)
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mudlord For This Useful Post:
niculaita (11-12-2015), rasta (12-01-2015)