#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
You don't like it so don't use it and don't write a silly comments again!! |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
It appears that I must remind the group again that you are not to post comments and/or criticisms about eachother or posters on these Forums.
If you have a complaint about a Post or Threat, send me a Private Message or post in the Suggestions and Feedback Forum. It is unnecessary to get upset with eachother and/or carry on a private spat (argument) here on these pages. I hope this is enough warning. Regards,
__________________
JMI |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
I've made a start on writing a similar tool to KGA. At the moment, for some unknown reason, I've called it BNC. I'm writing it in C++ Builder in plain C. I'm using OpenSSL for its 'BN' big number library and for it's Crypto capabilities. I am supplementing BN with the GMP big number library.
I am not, at the moment, planning for more that 3 tabs, being Calculator, Encryption and Hashing. More could be added later. I want the first tab to be a very comprehensive arbitary precision calculator, so the 'conversion' part of kga at the bottom of it's first tab will not be implemented, in favour of being able to independantly convert any of the P, Q, N, R fields between base 2, 10 and 16. I've tested that conversion up to 800,000,000 bits so far!. Crypto will be as full an implementation of the OpenSSL functions as I can manage, probably without the X509 stuff. I am more interested in an accurate low bug tool than bells and whistles. Any suggestion, comments or ideas welcome. Git |
The Following 2 Users Gave Reputation+1 to Git For This Useful Post: | ||
chessgod101 (03-06-2012) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Git, i know openssl is very powerful and complicated, but take a look at polarssl and miracl
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
I've used Miracl before and think GMP is better. Not heard of PolarSSL, I'll check it out, thanks.
Git |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
A warning though.
PolarSSL is GPL so you might need to open source your tool for it to be legal. |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Same with Miracl, they both have commercial backgrounds too. I think I will stick with OpenSSL and GMP. They are both good, well established packages with a lot of current development. Converting between the two big number formats is quite easy too.
Git |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Not to put you off or anything (I dont think there is a 1-1 over lap here), but for awareness sake there is another new tool being developed by SADUFF
http://forum.tuts4you.com/topic/28538-sdf-tool-keygenning-tool/page__fromsearch__1 |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
OK, more the merrier . I'm not a member there so I can't look at it, but I'm sure they'll do a good job. Meanwhile, it would be good if anybody has any suggestions for what they would like to see please.
Git |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
For anyone else interested but not a member over at t4u, the author is hosting on his own site
http://saduff.keygenme.com/downloads/SDF%20Tool.zip |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Expect new Keygener Assistant version soon, Sorry for late reply.
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Right, thanks. Pity somebody didn't say something earlier. Are they aware of the bugs?
Git |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Code:
http://i44.tinypic.com/29gc45.jpg http://i40.tinypic.com/72zpcg.jpg Any suggestion are welcome Regards |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
perfect.
where can i grab that beta? |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Hi,
Quote:
PHP Code:
PHP Code:
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|