#121
|
|||
|
|||
Well Dreamer, just imagine everyone would post "thank you" once over 15 posts, how would the forum look then?
Oh, eXoDia was faster, seems we share an opinion. |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
no its ok i will not post match thx post
Last edited by SubzEro; 09-11-2014 at 04:29. |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
@nikkapedd
could you elaborate on "antinet" component? as far as I know it is not a part of de4dot distribution |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
cannot edit my previus post i am not him i am not dreamer stop saying that
|
#125
|
|||
|
|||
Is the project dead or something? Cuz I suddenly cannot access the BitBucket address anymore
|
#126
|
|||
|
|||
0xd4d migrated to github again. See: https://github.com/0xd4d/de4dot
__________________
TEAM REiS - Reverse Engineering iN Software |
The Following User Gave Reputation+1 to LordCoder For This Useful Post: | ||
#127
|
||||
|
||||
I thought we were deleting ALL thank you posts?. Otherwise, why do we have a Thanks button?
Git |
The Following User Gave Reputation+1 to Git For This Useful Post: | ||
ZeNiX (09-12-2014) |
The Following User Says Thank You to Git For This Useful Post: | ||
TheEnd (04-07-2015) |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
Ye, the rule is technically there that you are allowed to spam it after 15 posts but well, it wasn't done this way at all since I am here and even longer (silent reader over years) and where is the point to do so? It's just bad and makes this forum worse.
|
The Following User Gave Reputation+1 to s0me0n3 For This Useful Post: | ||
ZeNiX (09-12-2014) |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
ok I apologize for thank you post no more thank you post
|
#130
|
|||
|
|||
does the latest edition of de4dot deobfuscate the latest eazfuscator. my version i have deobs it but throws errors when the unpacked is ran.
|
#131
|
|||
|
|||
It seems that this project is dead.
|
#132
|
||||
|
||||
hope it will continue. otherwise it will be more difficult to unpack .net, but it seems it's dead for now.
|
#133
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Don't worry. Common obfuscations will always have a tool coded for deobfuscate. Or you can start to learn I.L. and maybe make your own deobfuscator or modify de4dot to adapt to new requirements. |
The Following User Gave Reputation+1 to giv For This Useful Post: | ||
sendersu (02-08-2015) |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
I propose to put the discussion of de4dot improvements/support of new protectors/obfuscators here..
for example, I've an idea to add support for the AppFuscator. There is one real challenge for me - the mathematics used by that tool. In theory it is simple - you need to collecct and calculate all the math for all the input variables for the method, that decrypts the strings for your executable. I know that de4dot has a kind of emulator/simulator for the I.L. operands execution, but the case is how to identify what math is going to be used for each specific str decryptor, as in reality it takes tens of instructions (different number on different calls) |
The Following User Says Thank You to sendersu For This Useful Post: | ||
NoYes (04-04-2015) |
#135
|
||||
|
||||
sendersu, this version exists, it's just VIP only. Now, if you're interested in sharing it that'd be sweet!
Just wanted to bump the thread of the best .NET tool for RCE. |
Tags |
de4dot, deobfusacator |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[C#] De4Dot GUI | V0K3 | Source Code | 2 | 04-17-2015 06:07 |