#31
|
||||
|
||||
I do agree with this, the decompression is definitely slower then WinRAR. In my case though I can deal with the slow extractions because of my horrible internet speeds for downloads. So I tend to prefer seeing .7z files than .rar heh.
Hopefully some time soon someone will create a better archive format that is both fast and high-compressed. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Present PCs have enough power to use 7z. there is just some seconds diference. but for attachments and sending via email 7z is better.
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Personally I have used WinRAR from day one archive speed and compression no complaints.... I guess it also helps when you good speed from you isp.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Well 7z is free and also offers password encryption for example. Never had problems with it so far. As for Zip I can only recommend it compared to WinZip.
|
|
|