#1
|
|||
|
|||
best obfuscator for .net software
simple question - which obfuscator is the best to protect .net software?
i tried a lot of them and finally i didnt found a good one.... i know that .net software cant be protected in 100% but i want to know which one is the hardest to crack... regards |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Nice feature has Salamander .NET protector:
"... it converts the decompilable Microsoft Intermediate Language code (MSIL or CIL) of your assemblies into native format ...." We investigate some target but i can't say it's really secure ... (Maybe wrong implementation) Code:
http://www.remotesoft.com/salamander/protector.html |
The Following User Gave Reputation+1 to DARKER For This Useful Post: | ||
#3
|
|||
|
|||
hmm...
i'll try it i've been using eziriz that represents absolutely no protection... and now i use 9rays obfuscator... i'm going to compare it with salamander... |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
use SmartAssembly ver 4.0 or above.
salamander is crap. |
The Following User Gave Reputation+1 to Kurapica For This Useful Post: | ||
#5
|
|||
|
|||
i found SmartAssembly yesterday and i was pleasantly surprised when i tried to do anything with protected file... obfuscated code is invisible and for now i dont know how to deobfuscate it, but still trying
i dont know whether you know, but a new version has been released two days ago - i didnt use it yet but i want to know what's new, so probably i'll check it tommorow |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
[QUOTE=mafcin;68428]i found SmartAssembly yesterday and i was pleasantly surprised when i tried to do anything with protected file... obfuscated code is invisible and for now i dont know how to deobfuscate it, but still trying
First of all, remove second <Modules> table entry (usually empty), if one is present... (open file with CFF explorer). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I fully quote Kurapica ... Salamander (at least version 3.5 I saw) seems to be a bluff :P
Regards, Tony |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
it depends on the level of cracker, with a good cracker can bypass protect.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Codewall 2010 v4.0 also a tool to protect .NET applications is very good.
Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
cheap tricks !
it takes us back to 2004 or even before :S this is just my humble opinion. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
On-Topic, just go with a good obfuscator like {SmartAssembly}. Most of the JIT hooking protectors don't have very good obfuscation, so once you get the IL code back it's not a hard process to crack the exe. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
what do u think about that software: http://lukesw.net/apps/ProtectorLite.aspx
it's a little obfuscator made by polish student... it's not very popular and it's free for all |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
http://www.dnguard.net/
__________________
AKA Solomon/blowfish. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
this is infected by a virus - dont try to install this - scanned by latest versions of ESET NOD32 and Kaspersky Internet Security 2011
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
lol... no it's not. I've used that software before. It's clean. Maybe VmProtect causes the false-positive?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
.NET obfuscator | butter | General Discussion | 4 | 08-11-2004 17:08 |