Somebody used it for bad things and it is now detected as virus by anti virus.. if you read the readme in the source you would not have to ask this question..

And since someone leaked it from Exetools, now bad people use it. So whats the point of fighting it? Might as well let the bad people have 100% control now. >_>

At least I still have mupack3 for myself, which has a completely different stub and different structure. It still uses the LZMA and rangecoder+lz77 decompressors since to me those are still decent. And it has better code preprocessing, and fixes the problems mupack2 had. And no, that won't be public to anyone.

So thank the bad people for ruining things. Seems people cannot be trusted.

Did a update a while back to get it to run on XP.

I wonder whats the point since XP is now deprecated, but nonetheless...
pw: www.mudlord.info

@mudlord
what about making "mupack" open source ?