Exetools - Flexlm ECC alternate patching methods

Page 4 of 7

« First

Last »

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Exetools (https://forum.exetools.com/index.php)

- General Discussion (https://forum.exetools.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)

- - Flexlm ECC alternate patching methods (https://forum.exetools.com/showthread.php?t=12346)

xuehuge

11-19-2013 11:00

i try the xf-flexlm patcher ,it seems not work with v11.6.

^o8o^

01-11-2014 00:43

Any hints how to get three public key from our lmcrypt ?
If we have got three public key from lmcrypt & use them to patch the daemon then should we also patch the return compare of the public key verify ?

nikkapedd

01-14-2014 00:15

gurandiL, you can build your vendor using lmseeds
lmseeds1= 0x11111111
lmseeds2= 0x22222222
lmseeds3= 0x33333333
then use your new build as base with the tool "PubKey_Replacer170_win".. But i tried 3, 4 times and the tool does not work..
Other way is to build your vendor, but recovering the handshake 4 seeds with ida.. Then use the PubKey_Replacer170_win only for the right pubkey...

Here is the body of the core that you have to find in the original vendor, then put the seeds in your new build

Code:

In the body of this function find code like this:

code

if ((l_6buff == l_var_3315) && ((l_func_3313 ^ 2296) & 0xff)) l_func_3313 ^= 2296;

if ((l_6buff == (l_var_3315 + 1)) && ((l_func_3313 ^ 7557) & 0xff)) l_func_3313 ^= 7557;

if ((l_6buff == (l_var_3315 + 3)) && ((l_func_3313 ^ 1789) & 0xff)) l_func_3313 ^= 1789;

if ((l_6buff == (l_var_3315 + 2)) && ((l_func_3313 ^ 6361) & 0xff)) l_func_3313 ^= 6361;



The values (not in hex) 2296, 7557, 1789 and 6361 are the 4 seeds for the handshake process.

Find this function in the original vendor daemon and get this values. Replace values
in your lm_new.c file with the values from original vendor daemon.
Tested and working by a master flexlm reverser...!!!!!!!

Quote:

then should we also patch the return compare of the public key verify ?

this part is not necessary if you use your pubkey...

swlepus

01-14-2014 12:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikkapedd (Post 89388)

Code:

In the body of this function find code like this:

code

if ((l_6buff == l_var_3315) && ((l_func_3313 ^ 2296) & 0xff)) l_func_3313 ^= 2296;

if ((l_6buff == (l_var_3315 + 1)) && ((l_func_3313 ^ 7557) & 0xff)) l_func_3313 ^= 7557;

if ((l_6buff == (l_var_3315 + 3)) && ((l_func_3313 ^ 1789) & 0xff)) l_func_3313 ^= 1789;

if ((l_6buff == (l_var_3315 + 2)) && ((l_func_3313 ^ 6361) & 0xff)) l_func_3313 ^= 6361;



The values (not in hex) 2296, 7557, 1789 and 6361 are the 4 seeds for the handshake process.

So in this method, we can generate a real key for the original vendor? Is that true?:eek:
as far as I know, this is not possible, case the orignal vendor code is not include priv key at all.
Can you explain some details?

nikkapedd

01-15-2014 00:07

swlepus, I suggest you to read the readme file on the PubKey_Replacer170_win folder, and study the flexlm sdk. I already wrote that second way is working... You need only to know how to work ida pro and how to build the new vendor with VS2008/2010/2012...
Here another part of code from a v11.4 sdk

Code:

                if ((l_6counter == l_2086counter) && ((l_2082buff ^ 12052) & 0xff)) l_2082buff ^= 12052;

                if ((l_6counter == (l_2086counter + 1)) && ((l_2082buff ^ 3205) & 0xff)) l_2082buff ^= 3205;

                if ((l_6counter == (l_2086counter + 3)) && ((l_2082buff ^ 8108) & 0xff)) l_2082buff ^= 8108;

                if ((l_6counter == (l_2086counter + 2)) && ((l_2082buff ^ 8083) & 0xff)) l_2082buff ^= 8083;



The values (not in hex) 12052, 3205, 8108 and 8083 are the 4 seeds for the handshake process.

flexlm

03-16-2014 09:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by nathan (Post 84594)

In the perspective of digging deeper into the pubkey patch approach I would like to share few very useful information for those that intend to spend time on it.

Find attached the Generic pubkey replacer made by Tanker (win + linux). I tested the Win version on a couple of targets (v11.10 and v11.9.1) and it identifies the pubkey correctly (I double checked in the vendorcode struct in memory), however, I didn't manage to produce a working license, yet (work in progress as I may be missing something crucial in the generation).

Also I would like to recommend the follwing discussion which is quite informative IMHO:
http://bbs.pediy.com/showthread.php?t=152615

What am missing: reverse the obsucation algorithm used to store the pubkey in the client binary (any help is appreciated: CrackZ may be have something to say about :)) (note: not the one the scramble it in memory).

Anyone who would like to join the challenge is more than welcome of course. Feel free to test the Pubkey Replacer and feed back with success/unsuccess stories.

Enjoy !

nathan

i cann't download it..

FoxB	04-26-2014 01:40

@bgptlmzyh: RTFM rule before asking =)

NoFlexlm

05-15-2014 21:08

It seems that there are a lot of new things on Flexnet which I need study again.

rcer	05-19-2014 18:59

Hi nikkapedd,

I know how to work IDA & Hexrays decompiler, and tried to locate similar code patterns on a couple of vendor deamons I have on file, but was unable to find anything.

Do you have any tips for me?

rgds

rrer

nikkapedd

05-24-2014 00:33

rcer, if you looking for the handskake seeds, you need the target with the correct signature.. Now load with ida and find the 4/5 references to "handshake". REmember the the values of the seeds are not in hex..
Does anyone know the new obfuscation schema in the new 11.12 fnp that hide the pub and the private key..??? thanks in advance..
Now i'm able to make full working licenses, by building a vendor with my seeds and injecting my pub key...

rcer	05-26-2014 21:47

nikkapedd, thanks, but I think that I don't fully understand your explanation, I have several original vendor daemons, and when I load them in IDA, then decompile the code with Hexrays decompiler and then try to locate the c - code snippets similar to the ones from your previous post I am unable to find any. What is it that am I doing wrong?

FoxB	05-26-2014 22:28

tell us name of the vendor daemon

rcer	05-27-2014 20:45

Fox,

slbsls & scplmd

nikkapedd

05-28-2014 02:32

rcer, Slbsls use the Common vendor technology and is packed with "Virtual protect" like the last version of the slb programs.. You need first to unpack the vendor...
For scplmd is very very easy.. Already can make full licenses with the scplmd vendor..
TRy to build the new vendor with the right seeds, then open the file lm_new.c in the "build" folder. You will see the magic "handshake function".....
Sorry but i do not put any "function" for those 2 vendors....

rcer	05-29-2014 20:29

nikkapedd,

Thanks & I think I have finally grasped it!. Have a look at the PM I sent to you.

Still have one question. which program do I need to use to unpack Slbsls?

rgds

rcer

All times are GMT +8. The time now is 19:09.

Page 4 of 7

« First

Last »

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page