View Single Post
  #3  
Old 01-19-2023, 09:44
Nisy's Avatar
Nisy Nisy is offline
Family
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Posts: 14
Rept. Given: 0
Rept. Rcvd 24 Times in 7 Posts
Thanks Given: 1
Thanks Rcvd at 146 Times in 12 Posts
Nisy Reputation: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoza View Post
@Nisy
Testing on earlier version (Beta 6), so far it's perfect.
1. For almost targets (protected with VMProtect, Themida, etc.) is OK.
2. But for some target files which have "Anti /Disabled DLL Hijacking" it's still fail.
I haven't tested it further.
I hope you can consider "Anti/Disabled DLL Hijacking" solution for next release.

So far this is the best patcher tools that I ever used.
Keep your nice working.
Thanks to test feedback, the next version may prioritize support for custom hijacking module features. Traditional file patches are difficult to intelligently solve the file verification problem, hijacking patches can theoretically bypass the detection of the process through schemes such as off-link and HookAPI (baymax's function can actually meet part of it), but this egg is still left to crackers to solve it themselves ^_^
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Nisy For This Useful Post:
copyleft (01-21-2023), Dr.FarFar (01-31-2023)