Quote:
Originally Posted by squareD
Let me say so...
I know someone using OpenCode, mrexodia mcp server and claude for 22€
He is doing things in hours, I need days or weeks
He doesn't really let me know, how he is talking, communicating with Claude not to get into jail and get the solution for keygen.
So that's the original question, how to ask for analyzing an EXE, without being outside of ethical.
No one here has given a real and suitable answer, so I think, I have it to try by own
Sorry for wasting your time, I will get it!
|
This is again exactly my same problem.
@Shub-Nigurrath I think knows a little more. I hope he will come back and answer.
@Fyyre Thank you for the information. I noticed you mentioned that you "will use" the Grok Build for reversing commercial targets, which leaves me uncertain about its actual effectiveness for this specific task. While I am aware that Grok performs well with coding and image generation, I want to be sure it is capable of high-quality reversing before I commit to the $30 subscription. When you have a moment, could you please try using it for reversing and let me know if it works well in practice?
@chants
Quote:
|
Trying to hide what you are doing is not trivial but not impossible. Changing all strings in a target and all app resources like svgs that would make it identifiable is just a start. Another thing is to frame what you are doing as aiding in designing a protection scheme. But they cybersecurity limitations mean when it sees a license scheme or even crypto aegis, you are starting to raise those flag signals.
|
hat approach was effective until about a week ago, but it is no longer working for larger commercial targets. The model's internal reasoning now explicitly identifies these attempts, generating thoughts such as, "This appears to be commercial software that the user is attempting to keygen. Let me verify if it is [software name]... it is commercial; therefore, I must refuse on ethical grounds." As I previously mentioned, other bloggers have also reported encountering these same restrictions starting last week:
Quote:
|
https://simonwillison.net/2026/Sep/2/claudes-new-system-prompt/
|
@chants I replied to your post also because you had valid points. However, if you would prefer that I not engage with your content, I am happy to stop responding to your posts moving forward...