06-22-2010, 20:44
|
|
Fyyre
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: 0°N 0°E / 0°N 0°E / 0; 0
Posts: 260
Rept. Given: 77
Rept. Rcvd 85 Times in 38 Posts
Thanks Given: 147
Thanks Rcvd at 336 Times in 114 Posts
|
|
1b. As
Code:
int array[8] = {array[0] = 10, array[5] = 60};
Both macros, yes.
Somethings will require slight adjusting. I too use the Intel Compiler for driver building, from inside of Visual Studio 2008.
-Fyyre
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt
The issue with inline asm is you have to implement differnet set for different arch: i386, x86_64, IA64 etc. The only motivation for me, is using "lock", since VS lacks of support.
Anyone is familiar with Intel c compiler for Windows ? I want to confirm whehter intel c compiler supports these items:
1, structure designated initializers
Three formats are widely used, especially the 1st:
a) struct test {int i, j, k, l;} a = {.l = 60, .i = 10};
b) int array[8] = {[0] = 10, [5] = 60}; /* only initialize the
1st and 5th members */
c) struct test {int i, j, k, l;} a = {l = 60, i = 10};
2, macros to return a value
Complex macroes need "({ ... )}" style to return a value, eg:
1) #define min(X, Y) ({ typeof (X) x_ = (X); typeof (Y) y_ = (Y); \
(x_ < y_) ? x_ : y_; })
2) #define my_macro(cond, p1) ({while (cond) {rc = func(p1);}; rc;})
WDK compiler only supports "()" or "{}" styles. the former can carry
a return value but with limitations; the latter can not return a value
to its caller.
3, typeof
I'd like to replace MS compiler of WinDDK if intel compiler supports these features.
|
|