View Single Post
Old 06-20-2010, 20:43
Fyyre's Avatar
Fyyre Fyyre is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: 0°N 0°E / 0°N 0°E / 0; 0
Posts: 205
Rept. Given: 51
Rept. Rcvd 71 Times in 33 Posts
Thanks Given: 62
Thanks Rcvd at 257 Times in 88 Posts
Fyyre Reputation: 71
WinDbg has a large learning curve, and lacks many small features e.g. saving breakpoints between sessions.

IDA as a disasm, yes. As a debugger, no thanks...

Everyone has difference of preference, yet I think it fair(imo) to say both are sub-par when compared to OllyDbg.

Hopefully the OllyDbg64 comes with post haste.


Originally Posted by Git View Post
Lack of 64bit debugger?. Why do you think that?. Both IDA64 debugger and Microsoft Windbg (Debugging Tools for Windows) work just fine and I would be surprised if there are not others too.

Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fyyre For This Useful Post:
Indigo (07-19-2019)