View Single Post
  #21  
Old 10-20-2014, 09:41
0x22 0x22 is offline
Family
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 66
Rept. Given: 14
Rept. Rcvd 47 Times in 18 Posts
Thanks Given: 12
Thanks Rcvd at 64 Times in 21 Posts
0x22 Reputation: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carbon View Post
It still depends on the hardware (CPU power) of the machine. I have done a VMP loader myself in the past and I had to use Sleep() with a certain amount of time. The good thing is that you can automatically bruteforce the correct Sleep time more or less for a specific machine.

Real release groups don't allow "loader" cracks for obvious reasons.
Are you talking about my loader?
I'm not sure if i understood you correctly, because the source i posted here does not depend on hardware/CPU becuase it does not use sleep.
Sleep is a method i would never use at all, its shit, cuz yes as you said CPU.

I accept your critizism but i released my source to be nice, so that people that may not be "that" expericed with this, might solve it with my working method as well as giving people an idea to work on, and on how it could done.

To be honest i couldnt give two shits about what real release groups allow or not.
In my eyes, a working method is a working method, as long as the program opens, I'm happy and the users that use it will remain happy.

Good day.

Last edited by 0x22; 10-20-2014 at 10:29.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Gave Reputation+1 to 0x22 For This Useful Post:
b30wulf (10-20-2014)
The Following User Says Thank You to 0x22 For This Useful Post:
niculaita (08-30-2016)