![]() |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
hi britedream
I just got a short look at this one this morning. Seems to be a change in how the iat table is written during unpacking, and how the program actually uses the iat table. Check it out. Looks interesting.:-)
hobgoblin |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ASProtect or UPX? | int21h | General Discussion | 2 | 12-14-2006 11:02 |
| Help with ASProtect 1.23 RC4 | Perdition | General Discussion | 7 | 06-09-2004 01:48 |