Exetools  

Go Back   Exetools > General > General Discussion

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12  
Old 12-15-2015, 09:05
BlackWhite BlackWhite is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 85
Rept. Given: 4
Rept. Rcvd 14 Times in 6 Posts
Thanks Given: 14
Thanks Rcvd at 56 Times in 25 Posts
BlackWhite Reputation: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kerlingen View Post
The point is that you don't modify any existing code to a specific value, you just add some random data without any meaning while leaving the original EXE completely untouched.

This is just a normal collision of random data which has been done many times by many people and has nothing to do with EXE file. (and which cannot be used to create "bad" EXE files with the same hash as existing "good" EXE files)
Yes. No one can create a "bad" EXE with the same hash as the
existing "good" EXE if this "good" EXE is specified by others.

But if you craft that "good" EXE yourself, you can create a "bad" one,
and under some circumstances, you can defraud sb of a digital signature for
the "good" EXE and then apply to the "bad" one.

So my method is to some degrees concerned with EXE file. If you append
the collision data to a .doc file, it will not affect the contents of that
doc file, yet if you append the collision data to an exe, it can affect
the results of that exe.
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Difficult debugging situation Git General Discussion 4 10-21-2005 20:13
cracking jcreator, is it difficult? doby General Discussion 6 09-27-2004 16:15


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 03:29.


Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX, chessgod101
( Since 1998 )