mupack

mudlord · #1 12-24-2015, 04:59

As a direct response to the leaker, I have documented the main depacker internals. I might do a static unpacker, too.

Quote:

http://www.mudlord.info/blog/?p=286

I have no intention of obfuscation at all. Being transparent should be a goal of any ethical programmer. Hopefully this stops any ideas of people using the packer to pack malware.

mudlord · #2 01-07-2016, 16:53

Updated:

* better error handling when handling invalid files (already mupacked files, .NET assemblies, x64 files).
* tested post packing digital code signing.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

The Following 2 Users Gave Reputation+1 to mudlord For This Useful Post:
mr.exodia (01-07-2016), Storm Shadow (01-08-2016)

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to mudlord For This Useful Post:
alephz (01-08-2016), dj-siba (01-07-2016), MarcElBichon (01-07-2016), Max (04-04-2016), niculaita (01-07-2016)