VMProtect Devirtualization - Experimental dynamic approach

[user1]

but why not devirtualize Chinese packers and Chinese protections?

why vmp? people paid good genuine $ to have such protection,

now all you protected is going to trash.

not ok in github over 10 reps that suppose to host legitimate genuine src NOT copyrighted protections.

is NOT fine, destroy it so all genuine protected VMP software companies bankrupt all.

[Kerlingen]

Originally Posted by user1

but why not devirtualize Chinese packers and Chinese protections?

why vmp? people paid good genuine $ to have such protection,

now all you protected is going to trash.

When you sell stolen dongle emulators (for software not owned by or licensed to you), then all the time and money invested into the dongle protection by the software's legitimate owners goes to trash.

Why don't you use "Chinese packers and Chinese protections" instead? There is really no need to revolt every time somebody posts anything about VMProtect just because you fear your revenue from selling stolen software decreases?

[sh3dow]

Originally Posted by user1

but why not devirtualize Chinese packers and Chinese protections?
.

Because VMP is quite popular and used everywhere from legit use such as software protection to shady use such as cheats and malware protection.
Fame is like a curse, it's like asking why people still passionately waiting for IDA pro leaks while good alternative like Ghidra/binary ninja exist.

[CryptXor]

I mean its not the first anti-vmp project, eg NoVmp (https://github.com/can1357/NoVmp), dunno why this one is upsetting people so much :P

Originally Posted by user1

but why not devirtualize Chinese packers and Chinese protections?

Which ones specifically, asking for a friend