Exetools  

Go Back   Exetools > General > General Discussion

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #26  
Old 09-07-2026, 00:54
th3tuga th3tuga is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 59
Rept. Given: 0
Rept. Rcvd 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks Given: 13
Thanks Rcvd at 26 Times in 15 Posts
th3tuga Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by squareD View Post
Let me say so...
I know someone using OpenCode, mrexodia mcp server and claude for 22€
He is doing things in hours, I need days or weeks
He doesn't really let me know, how he is talking, communicating with Claude not to get into jail and get the solution for keygen.
So that's the original question, how to ask for analyzing an EXE, without being outside of ethical.
No one here has given a real and suitable answer, so I think, I have it to try by own

Sorry for wasting your time, I will get it!
This is again exactly my same problem.
@Shub-Nigurrath I think knows a little more. I hope he will come back and answer.

@Fyyre Thank you for the information. I noticed you mentioned that you "will use" the Grok Build for reversing commercial targets, which leaves me uncertain about its actual effectiveness for this specific task. While I am aware that Grok performs well with coding and image generation, I want to be sure it is capable of high-quality reversing before I commit to the $30 subscription. When you have a moment, could you please try using it for reversing and let me know if it works well in practice?

@chants
Quote:
Trying to hide what you are doing is not trivial but not impossible. Changing all strings in a target and all app resources like svgs that would make it identifiable is just a start. Another thing is to frame what you are doing as aiding in designing a protection scheme. But they cybersecurity limitations mean when it sees a license scheme or even crypto aegis, you are starting to raise those flag signals.
hat approach was effective until about a week ago, but it is no longer working for larger commercial targets. The model's internal reasoning now explicitly identifies these attempts, generating thoughts such as, "This appears to be commercial software that the user is attempting to keygen. Let me verify if it is [software name]... it is commercial; therefore, I must refuse on ethical grounds." As I previously mentioned, other bloggers have also reported encountering these same restrictions starting last week:
Quote:
https://simonwillison.net/2026/Sep/2/claudes-new-system-prompt/
@chants I replied to your post also because you had valid points. However, if you would prefer that I not engage with your content, I am happy to stop responding to your posts moving forward...
Reply With Quote
 

Tags
mcp, mrexodia

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +8. The time now is 04:43.


Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX, chessgod101
( Since 1998 )