Exetools  

Go Back   Exetools > General > General Discussion

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old 12-08-2006, 22:57
MarkusO
 
Posts: n/a
Well, I know the difference between virtualisation and a virtual machine. And, again, I didn't say this protection uses a VM.

Of course a VM needs a operating environment. But anybody can code a VM in just two minutes (OK, maybe 2 hours if you don't just want to have a two-opcode VM, but something which can be used for something).

But the problem is not to create the VM, the problem is how to convert any existing piece of code into virtual opcodes, which behave in the VM exactly like the original opcodes on a real CPU.

And if you've already analysed the original code deep enough to use the type of protection mentioned in the first post, it is just a simple step to convert any instruction into a virtual opcode and run it in the VM.

What other really big part do you miss, if this "is not even a small step for vm development"? (assuming that I'm not a super great coding mastermind and therefore don't understand where the big problem is hiding)
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
.net modification of a method (without decompilation) Shub-Nigurrath General Discussion 8 10-15-2013 21:04
search method passwords goku General Discussion 7 07-14-2010 02:15
Protection against point-h method? TheDutchJewel General Discussion 7 05-06-2004 01:32
What method to use? bartster General Discussion 11 02-08-2004 23:19


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 10:50.


Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX, chessgod101
( Since 1998 )