Exetools  

Go Back   Exetools > General > General Discussion

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 10-19-2005, 03:23
cbs
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by winndy
You could look at the apis32 v2.5.
And I will provide more keys for the same username.
I'll have a look at this when I get free minute

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lunar_Dust
If MD5 (the most common hash) has collision (still very rare I think) ...
Agree with you about that RSA itself can't have collisions It can only be a result of collision in hash.
Otherwise you won't be able to read messages encrypted with RSA - because they could have few meanings

What about MD5 - actually now MD5 is definitely not safe (because of this MD5(x)=MD5(y) => MD5(x+z)=MD5(y+z) ). You can check out this article:
Code:
http://www.codeproject.com/dotnet/HackingMd5.asp
Microsoft has even decided to ban MD5:

Quote:
Originally Posted by eweek.com
Microsoft is banning certain cryptographic functions from new computer code, citing increasingly sophisticated attacks that make them less secure, according to a company executive. The Redmond, Wash., software company instituted a new policy for all developers that bans functions using the DES, MD4, MD5 and, in some cases, the SHA1 encryption algorithm, which is becoming "creaky at the edges," said Michael Howard, senior security program manager at the company, Howard said.


Quote:
Originally Posted by bytescrk
What is the needed to use PPSIQS, i am receiving only...
You can also use 'packet factoring', i.e. you can create ppsiqs.in (or whatsoever).
In this file you put all your numbers that you would like to factor in decimal notation (base-10) like this:

Code:
224723992774119006825578513302384489873
156501211667442645087401128910164446481
119399008393514320049994534947283967297
211087890988599145775593649671167343561
222924203035635853575650313518923532737
Then you type
Code:
ppsiqs.exe < ppsiqs.in
and then you will have results in SIQS.LOG
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-19-2005, 03:52
bytescrk
 
Posts: n/a
I am receiving "unknown function"

My OS is Windows XP Pro SP2, i seen in the .txt file included

* Environment

OS : Windows 95
Windows 98
Windows NT4.0
Windows 2000
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-19-2005, 09:57
cbs
 
Posts: n/a
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by bytescrk
I am receiving "unknown function"

My OS is Windows XP Pro SP2, i seen in the .txt file included

* Environment

OS : Windows 95
Windows 98
Windows NT4.0
Windows 2000
I suppose you are trying to enter a number written in hexadecimal notation (base-16). And you have to enter a number in decimal notation (base-10).
For example let's factor number
Code:
E7C8A74C73FD2FBAC4F42216DFA687C1
in decimal notation it's
Code:
308093519617663552837864268966148868033


Code:
Input number ( input 0 to exit )
E7C8A74C73FD2FBAC4F42216DFA687C1

unkown function E7C8A74C73FD2FBAC4F42216DFA687C1

Code:
Input number ( input 0 to exit )
308093519617663552837864268966148868033

PPSIQS Ver 1.1 by S.Tomabechi 2001
C39=308093519617663552837864268966148868033
#FactorBase 512 max FactorBase 7867
max LargePrime 288950 Upper Bound 5251270668
SieveWidth 12288 SieveUnit 12288 CutOff 71 multiplier 1
To stop sieving, press Ctrl + Pause


458(640)/544
search cycles
102 duplicated data merged in Large Prime
56 duplicated data merged
(f)  type 458 total 631
(p)  type 1523( p_p 229, p_p_pp 0, p_p_p_p_pp_pp 0)
(pp) type 0( pp_pp 0, pp_pp_pp 0, others 0)

block Lanczos method
#singleton 29 : zero-weight columns 6
477*515 matrix 16.1363 entries / row
nonzero entry 7697 memory 31K
 #iteration 16 gained 32 solutions  0:00:00:07
found  factor 18014544488287572347
cputime 0:00:08:73
t et 60 6814407600
Jacobi Sum Test ( APR-CL )
for P=2 Q=3 5 7 13 11 31 61
for P=3 Q=7 13 31 61
for P=5 Q=11 31 61
final test
t et 60 6814407600
Jacobi Sum Test ( APR-CL )
for P=2 Q=3 5 7 13 11 31 61
for P=3 Q=7 13 31 61
for P=5 Q=11 31 61
final test
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Idenitfying a cryptographic algorithm wassim_ General Discussion 1 07-15-2020 22:15
Public White-Box Cryptographic Implementations and their Practical Attacks TechLord General Discussion 8 12-20-2016 08:03


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 00:09.


Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX, chessgod101
( Since 1998 )