![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Definitely, the RISC VM is awesome. Well coded and most awesome, you can see the work that has gone into it. And a lot harder than anything VMP has.
But mostly actually the good stuff in VMprotect is stolen from other protections. It's heap antidump comes from Winlicense and it's CPUID comes from securom. Also it's obfuscation is retarded. It's VM is pretty OK though, they do a good job confusing you at first. And the fact it's VM exits have the same signature as their main handler is nice. It's not bad and with the info around perhaps harder than WL, but imho it's a lot worse. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi,
If I'm not wrong than the "Senselock Dongle" has never been cracked or Emulated. Even not from professional crackers. Never seen a release from a software which uses this Dongle. At the moment I know only two apps, which uses this dongle. InteriCAD 6000 http://www.yfcad.com/Products/intericad6000.php VideoCAD 7.0 http://www.cctvcad.com/CCTVCAD-Information.html More Info: http://seculab.ru/en/projects-senselock.php http://www.sense.com.cn/xwdt/cfca.htm Maybe someone have more information about this. cu mnemonic72 Last edited by mnemonic72; 03-31-2011 at 05:57. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The same thing is for Rockey 6 and all other smartcards based products.
Exactly, there is always a chance to break protection with success. It depends on the algorithms developers put into dongle. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
@mnemonic72: you do not see those are cracked that not mean SenseLock is not cracked nor uncrack-able. I know some mates here reversed some apps with that protection completely.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
In the Visual Fox Pro terms it seems that Defox IV is at this moment uncrackable. Reversing the Defox IV seems impossible for the moment. In the general section is a attachament protected (sample) with the Defox IV and posted there by the author itself. It claims it's unbreakable.
Last edited by giv; 04-19-2011 at 17:59. Reason: Spelling. Not a native English speaker. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Now that Defox IV is gone......
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm sorry, you are right guys. Its not a good indication that if something have not shown up in the public, it still could already be defeated
![]() I could be wrong, but isnt on those SmarCard Based cards, a code "processed" inside the SmardCard and not only Question and Answer principle like other dongles. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Execryptor is my best
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
any one can be crack the new format in winlisence?
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
What do you mean by new format?
What is the difference? |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
I wonder if anyone managed to do DNGuard HVM ? as i have been told it is next to impossible to unpack it.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
@EAX666 there are tools for it. It is nothing too special, just another JIT-hooking .NET protector.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Enigma and Molebox together, I try to unpack this method with a visual basic app that I created, sincerely I cannot do it. The exeinfo inform nothing, the rdg inform only enigma, if you try the unpack enigma the soft crash.
|
| The Following User Gave Reputation+1 to wilson bibe For This Useful Post: | ||
Dreamer (11-30-2012) | ||
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
For Enigma up to 3.7 exists a public solution (1. by Raham 2. by LCF-AT) for upper versions are kept private, and Molebox is easy meal, all versions have been cracked.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How come new registrants given "guest" rank and not even a "friend" rank? | OldieHans | General Discussion | 4 | 09-25-2023 12:19 |
| When use "vendor defined encryption routines", how to set daemon related part? | bridgeic | General Discussion | 6 | 01-22-2015 11:35 |
| Wlscgen: Are "Vendor Id" and "Developer Id" different ? | Numega Softice | General Discussion | 6 | 02-12-2007 18:12 |