#1
|
|||
|
|||
how to compile windows NT4/2000?
Does anyone know how to compile the Windows NT4 or 2000 leaked source code?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I don't think you can compile it by yourself.
First, that code is not complete. Second, probably micro***t has his own compiler.. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Code...
In order to compile the code you will need to reconstruct a lot of missing libraries and header files. This is strictly a subset of code and basically exists for informational purposes only. You can gather more from reading the code than you likely could from compiling it, given you already have a version of the executable running on your machine.
Further, this code was not leaked from Microsoft, but one of their partners and as such is not "stock" Microsoft code. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Most of the parts of nt4 could be compiled.
Cheer ~ |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
mission impossible
__________________
AKA Solomon/blowfish. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Better then MS source
If you would like to play with/learn about how Windows NT/2K works and are put together, you should check out:
Reactos These guys are building a binary compatible NT operating system from the ground up. An amazing amount of it is already in place inluding most of the low leve kernel support. Best of all, its an open source project. Although it is not the source code to Windows, I have used it to determine how functions 'probably' work with great success. WCFF |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
WINE anyone?
I would take a good look at WINE.
They are much farther along then Reactos... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Reactos and Wine
Quote:
The most interesting part of Reactos is the binary interface duplication all the way into the kernel level. Where wine calls linux/un*x system calls, essentially emulating a function, Reactos has built the exact same substrate within which all their code lies. Due to the API restrictions, much of the functional guts of the functions (esp, API functions) tend to match closely to Microsoft's code (per the DDK samples). The main differences has to do with side effects that Reactos must find to duplicate, which should not be relied on in the first place. WCFF |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I don't think it will work
AFAIK£¬The leaking code is not complete yet.
When the code leaked, I got it from net and check it rough. It's obviously the leaking code is just a piece of the whole project. BTW: Some shell App can compiled. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Some more information on the source code is available from AndreaGeddon @ RET -- http://www.reteam.org/papers/e52.pdf
I've *some* of this paper and its really good. Enjoy! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Windows 2000 and Windows nt 4 sources, question | shady | General Discussion | 2 | 04-15-2004 04:17 |
Windows 2000 Device Driver Book + Inside Windows 2000 at FTP | dynio | General Discussion | 16 | 09-19-2003 23:21 |