JEB Decompiler 5.2.0.202308292043 mod by CXV

[CXVUSER]

Requirements: (Only JDK 17.0.X or above), 64-bit OS

Press Generate a Key in welcome window

Mod info(changes):
- fix all integrity checks\timebomb
- Time-limited sessions fixed
- Requires an Internet connection fixed
- dexdec: fix string decrypt via emulation
- dexdec: instruction conversion recovered
- gui: Usage of the clipboard is disallowed fixed
- jdb2: Saving or loading projects is disabled fixed
- android debug enabled
- android native debug enabled
- avrdec: decompiler enabled
- Decompiler exporter fixed
- CF-unflattener, unvirtualizer, native emulator, and plugins fixed
- callgraph enabled

Download:
https://pixeldrain.com/u/iPz6HCP2 mod by CXV

home of project: https://www.pnfsoftware.com/

[NeWOT]

Thanks for sharing this. I'll give it a shot later today.

[sendersu]

Interesting modern AI-ish feature was introduced in the latest 5.2:

Starting from JEB 5.2, you may use the experimental “JEB Assistant” to infer names for decompiled methods and method parameters.

https://www.pnfsoftware.com/blog/jeb-assistant/

[DARKER]

Originally Posted by sendersu

Starting from JEB 5.2, you may use the experimental “JEB Assistant” to infer names for decompiled methods and method parameters.

Nice feature, currently several limitations apply:

• The assistant is limited to decompiled native routines. It will not work for dex/dalvik decompilations.
• The assistant will refuse to work on overly long routines (whose decompilation exceeds several thousand characters).
• The assistant is not available via the JEB API and requests are rate-limited (at most one every 5 seconds).

[sendersu]

Originally Posted by DARKER

Nice feature, currently several limitations apply:

• The assistant is not available via the JEB API and requests are rate-limited (at most one every 5 seconds).

does it mean that feature is online only...
like JEB talks to backend servers and got the AI-ish result over API?

[blue_devil]

Originally Posted by sendersu

does it mean that feature is online only...
like JEB talks to backend servers and got the AI-ish result over API?

Yes this feature needs to be online. It asks you to accept to send the decompiled result to JEB servers.

[sendersu]

It means that (most probably, just an educated guess) it also conveys the request for this feature with the corresponding license?
....

[blue_devil]

Originally Posted by sendersu

It means that (most probably, just an educated guess) it also conveys the request for this feature with the corresponding license?
....

OK; I did not sniff the outgoing packages or reverse engineer JEB to understand what it conveys when using assistant. I have only checked if it is working or not!

Since it only "guesses" a better function name, it is useless for me right at the moment. Bu I believe, they will improve this feature!

[Dxer]

After trying, JEB's decompilation effect is really good: it can automatically obfuscate the original decrypted string after confusing the garbled string

[zerotimer]

Originally Posted by Dxer

After trying, JEB's decompilation effect is really good: it can automatically obfuscate the original decrypted string after confusing the garbled string

Interestingly; JEB can decrypt APKEncryptor by default. I was impressed!

[Moe]

Originally Posted by zerotimer

Interestingly; JEB can decrypt APKEncryptor by default. I was impressed!

Check the github time stamps: it is from March 2021. With source code available. It is not too difficult to decrypt it manually either. A lot easier than with ConfuserEx for Windows based .Net at any rate.

[zerotimer]

Originally Posted by Abdul Moeed

Check the github time stamps: it is from March 2021.

I did.

Originally Posted by Abdul Moeed

With source code available.

I know; I have shared the repo above.

Originally Posted by Abdul Moeed

It is not too difficult to decrypt it manually either.

It might not be difficult but time consuming!

Originally Posted by Abdul Moeed

A lot easier than with ConfuserEx for Windows based .Net at any rate.

I don't get this one. Can you protect an APK with ConfuserEX?