#61
|
|||
|
|||
Hi,
If I'm not wrong than the "Senselock Dongle" has never been cracked or Emulated. Even not from professional crackers. Never seen a release from a software which uses this Dongle. At the moment I know only two apps, which uses this dongle. InteriCAD 6000 http://www.yfcad.com/Products/intericad6000.php VideoCAD 7.0 http://www.cctvcad.com/CCTVCAD-Information.html More Info: http://seculab.ru/en/projects-senselock.php http://www.sense.com.cn/xwdt/cfca.htm Maybe someone have more information about this. cu mnemonic72 Last edited by mnemonic72; 03-31-2011 at 05:57. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
The same thing is for Rockey 6 and all other smartcards based products.
Exactly, there is always a chance to break protection with success. It depends on the algorithms developers put into dongle. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Lol, it's cracked already
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
@mnemonic72: you do not see those are cracked that not mean SenseLock is not cracked nor uncrack-able. I know some mates here reversed some apps with that protection completely.
|
#65
|
||||
|
||||
In the Visual Fox Pro terms it seems that Defox IV is at this moment uncrackable. Reversing the Defox IV seems impossible for the moment. In the general section is a attachament protected (sample) with the Defox IV and posted there by the author itself. It claims it's unbreakable.
Last edited by giv; 04-19-2011 at 17:59. Reason: Spelling. Not a native English speaker. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
My Opinion
Arma and themeda I think are the best
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
I'm sorry, you are right guys. Its not a good indication that if something have not shown up in the public, it still could already be defeated
I could be wrong, but isnt on those SmarCard Based cards, a code "processed" inside the SmardCard and not only Question and Answer principle like other dongles. |
#68
|
||||
|
||||
Now that Defox IV is gone......
Quote:
|
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Execryptor is my best
|
#70
|
|||
|
|||
any one can be crack the new format in winlisence?
|
#71
|
||||
|
||||
What do you mean by new format?
What is the difference? |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
I wonder if anyone managed to do DNGuard HVM ? as i have been told it is next to impossible to unpack it.
|
#73
|
|||
|
|||
@EAX666 there are tools for it. It is nothing too special, just another JIT-hooking .NET protector.
|
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Enigma and Molebox together, I try to unpack this method with a visual basic app that I created, sincerely I cannot do it. The exeinfo inform nothing, the rdg inform only enigma, if you try the unpack enigma the soft crash.
|
The Following User Gave Reputation+1 to wilson bibe For This Useful Post: | ||
Dreamer (11-30-2012) |
#75
|
||||
|
||||
For Enigma up to 3.7 exists a public solution (1. by Raham 2. by LCF-AT) for upper versions are kept private, and Molebox is easy meal, all versions have been cracked.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
When use "vendor defined encryption routines", how to set daemon related part? | bridgeic | General Discussion | 6 | 01-22-2015 11:35 |
Wlscgen: Are "Vendor Id" and "Developer Id" different ? | Numega Softice | General Discussion | 6 | 02-12-2007 18:12 |