![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Would you use this debugger? | |||
Yes (mainly x32) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
95 | 28.79% |
Not at all ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
25 | 7.58% |
Yes, if it gets better (please post feature suggestions) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
90 | 27.27% |
Yes (mainly x64) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
120 | 36.36% |
Voters: 330. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#346
|
||||
|
||||
That’s changing quite rapidly .. see for example this
https://simonwillison.net/2025/Jul/2/mandelbrot-in-x86-assembly-by-claude/
__________________
Ŝħůb-Ňìĝùŕřaŧħ ₪) There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't http://www.accessroot.com |
#347
|
||||
|
||||
I could not even assemble the very first generated mandelbrot assembly code:
Code:
nasm -felf64 mandel.asm mandel.asm:13: error: comma expected after operand, got `*' mandel.asm:14: error: comma expected after operand, got `*' mandel.asm:15: error: comma expected after operand, got `*' mandel.asm:16: error: comma expected after operand, got `*' |
![]() |
Tags |
bit, debugger, x32, x64, x64_dbg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Baymax toOls for x64dbg v1.9 | Nisy | Community Tools | 1 | 03-26-2024 09:09 |
x64DBG trace logging | Stingered | General Discussion | 1 | 12-22-2022 16:00 |
Add .lib file on x64dbg ? | LaDidi | General Discussion | 0 | 02-18-2022 14:39 |
nfd - x64dbg plugin | hors | Community Tools | 2 | 04-01-2018 08:18 |
x64dbg python | Storm Shadow | Developer Section | 6 | 08-04-2017 15:29 |