Exetools  

Go Back   Exetools > General > General Discussion

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 09-24-2017, 15:35
TechLord TechLord is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 10 Steps Ahead of You
Posts: 761
Rept. Given: 384
Rept. Rcvd 247 Times in 112 Posts
Thanks Given: 789
Thanks Rcvd at 2,022 Times in 571 Posts
TechLord Reputation: 200-299 TechLord Reputation: 200-299 TechLord Reputation: 200-299
Quote:
Originally Posted by sendersu View Post
then your way is to 16 (8!?) bit SW
it much more coolier taking into account your great posts
You do remember that in the good old days, many of us have had to use Windows 98 (rather than Win XP ) when we needed to use the SOFTICE debugger, as SOFTICE was quite unstable on Windows 2000 and Win XP (until they finally released a patch after more than an year at that time).

Also, for the jump from 16-bit to 32-bit, mostly the issues addressed were related to STABILITY, in teh various releases of Windows, rather than mainly focussing on SECURITY.

Whereas in the transition from 32-bit to 64-bit versions of Windows, mainly for Windows 10 releases, the focus is now more on SECURITY rather than on stability, as the stability (BSODs etc) were not the main issue from XP onwards on properly configuerd systems.

That is why, in my practical experience, driver debugging is a nightmare on the 64-bit versions of Windows 10 due to its numerous security features, compared to its 32-bit counterpart.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TechLord For This Useful Post:
memo-5 (09-29-2017), niculaita (09-25-2017)
  #32  
Old 09-29-2017, 03:06
professor.frink professor.frink is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 41
Rept. Given: 12
Rept. Rcvd 4 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks Given: 24
Thanks Rcvd at 10 Times in 9 Posts
professor.frink Reputation: 4
@Fyyre, @sf42

any update on the private symbols?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to professor.frink For This Useful Post:
TechLord (09-29-2017)
  #33  
Old 09-29-2017, 11:29
sf42 sf42 is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 117
Rept. Given: 23
Rept. Rcvd 28 Times in 13 Posts
Thanks Given: 22
Thanks Rcvd at 82 Times in 32 Posts
sf42 Reputation: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by professor.frink View Post
@Fyyre, @sf42

any update on the private symbols?
I have no idea if any of the builds have private symbols or not. Here's a list of what is available.

https://www.betaarchive.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6083&start=475

Last edited by sf42; 09-29-2017 at 21:09. Reason: Added: "private"
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 09-29-2017, 19:46
nulli nulli is offline
VIP
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 172
Rept. Given: 41
Rept. Rcvd 22 Times in 12 Posts
Thanks Given: 53
Thanks Rcvd at 73 Times in 53 Posts
nulli Reputation: 22
Can you obtain anything from that list? There are several interesting things which would be great to have there. I would personally like all these things but if the OS are to big then the debug symbols would be very cool as well.

Such as these checked debug symbols:
Added: Microsoft Windows 10 Debug Symbols (10.0.10540.0) (x64chk beta)
Added: Microsoft Windows 10 Debug Symbols (10.0.10540.0) (x86chk beta)

And these checked Windows 10 OS:
Added: 10.0.10540.0.th2_release.150903-1605_amd64chk_client-professional-core_retail_en-us
Added: 10.0.10540.0.th2_release.150903-1605_x86chk_client-professional-core_retail_en-us
Added: 10.0.10575.0.th2_release.151017-2006_amd64chk_client-professional-core_retail_en-us
Added: 10.0.10575.0.th2_release.151017-2006_x86chk_client-professional-core_retail_en-us
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 09-29-2017, 21:29
NoFaTe NoFaTe is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1
Rept. Given: 0
Rept. Rcvd 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Rcvd at 2 Times in 1 Post
NoFaTe Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by nulli View Post
Can you obtain anything from that list? There are several interesting things which would be great to have there. I would personally like all these things but if the OS are to big then the debug symbols would be very cool as well.

Such as these checked debug symbols:
Added: Microsoft Windows 10 Debug Symbols (10.0.10540.0) (x64chk beta)
Added: Microsoft Windows 10 Debug Symbols (10.0.10540.0) (x86chk beta)

And these checked Windows 10 OS:
Added: 10.0.10540.0.th2_release.150903-1605_amd64chk_client-professional-core_retail_en-us
Added: 10.0.10540.0.th2_release.150903-1605_x86chk_client-professional-core_retail_en-us
Added: 10.0.10575.0.th2_release.151017-2006_amd64chk_client-professional-core_retail_en-us
Added: 10.0.10575.0.th2_release.151017-2006_x86chk_client-professional-core_retail_en-us
Here you go!

Debug symbols: https://mega.nz/#!EGpG3CAC!5UMzYsLat91aG6KmbhL0DET_Kqmdh3u-tYUYlvouxjs

Contains symbols for:
  • 10.0.10540.0 x64 (Checked)
  • 10.0.10540.0 x86 (Checked)
  • 10.0.16251.1000 x86
  • 10.0.16278.1000 x64
Debug/Checked Windows Builds:
10.0.10575.0 x64 Pro: https://mega.nz/#!8apCmK5T!I_2LwiCH1uK85PpXSrvGUAlOz5mQ9KA4k-m7W2PTpHs
10.0.10575.0 x86 Pro: https://mega.nz/#!9PpVQA5T!Ap9e5afdRg-G5M_2ySpQqi51-wC6KnmyAw970a8bs48

Password is "eXeTools".
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NoFaTe For This Useful Post:
memo-5 (09-29-2017), nulli (09-29-2017)
  #36  
Old 09-30-2017, 02:07
TechLord TechLord is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 10 Steps Ahead of You
Posts: 761
Rept. Given: 384
Rept. Rcvd 247 Times in 112 Posts
Thanks Given: 789
Thanks Rcvd at 2,022 Times in 571 Posts
TechLord Reputation: 200-299 TechLord Reputation: 200-299 TechLord Reputation: 200-299
What we are looking for are actually private symbols

The "normal" symbols are available freely for download from Microsoft for everyone ... For example, from this page ...

They can also be downloaded as needed from their Symbol Server...

So please share the "private" symbols if possible ...

Thank you
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TechLord For This Useful Post:
niculaita (06-25-2018)
  #37  
Old 09-30-2017, 14:22
sf42 sf42 is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 117
Rept. Given: 23
Rept. Rcvd 28 Times in 13 Posts
Thanks Given: 22
Thanks Rcvd at 82 Times in 32 Posts
sf42 Reputation: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechLord View Post
What we are looking for are actually private symbols

The "normal" symbols are available freely for download from Microsoft for everyone ... For example, from this page ...

They can also be downloaded as needed from their Symbol Server...

So please share the "private" symbols if possible ...

Thank you
The problem is that I have no idea which builds include private symbols!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sf42 For This Useful Post:
TechLord (09-30-2017)
  #38  
Old 10-01-2017, 01:05
chants chants is offline
VIP
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 737
Rept. Given: 37
Rept. Rcvd 48 Times in 30 Posts
Thanks Given: 671
Thanks Rcvd at 1,064 Times in 482 Posts
chants Reputation: 48
Can we get the size of the builds, perhaps given the large size of the private symbols, there is a correlation in the build size or some other hint like build numbers or naming convention, etc so we don't have to go through the laborious one by one download task.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-01-2017, 02:20
sendersu sendersu is offline
VIP
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,067
Rept. Given: 332
Rept. Rcvd 223 Times in 115 Posts
Thanks Given: 235
Thanks Rcvd at 512 Times in 288 Posts
sendersu Reputation: 200-299 sendersu Reputation: 200-299 sendersu Reputation: 200-299
Guys, there are lots of tools like pdbdump/etc etc

lets use it over all the *.pdb and compare
profit?
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-05-2017, 21:03
yijun yijun is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 38
Rept. Given: 9
Rept. Rcvd 24 Times in 8 Posts
Thanks Given: 12
Thanks Rcvd at 14 Times in 10 Posts
yijun Reputation: 24
where's the source?
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 06-02-2018, 04:13
ilikenwf ilikenwf is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 3
Rept. Given: 0
Rept. Rcvd 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks Given: 1
Thanks Rcvd at 9 Times in 3 Posts
ilikenwf Reputation: 0
I have the OpenNT, Windows NT, some win2k leaks...any interest there?
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ilikenwf For This Useful Post:
evlncrn8 (06-02-2018), tonyweb (06-02-2018)
  #42  
Old 06-02-2018, 07:16
deepzero's Avatar
deepzero deepzero is offline
VIP
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 300
Rept. Given: 111
Rept. Rcvd 64 Times in 42 Posts
Thanks Given: 178
Thanks Rcvd at 216 Times in 92 Posts
deepzero Reputation: 64
I would like to have them for my collection, would be nice if you could post them.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to deepzero For This Useful Post:
tonyweb (06-02-2018)
  #43  
Old 06-25-2018, 18:25
mak mak is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 35
Rept. Given: 10
Rept. Rcvd 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks Given: 33
Thanks Rcvd at 36 Times in 15 Posts
mak Reputation: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by deepzero View Post
I would like to have them for my collection, would be nice if you could post them.
https://releases.opennt.eu/
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mak For This Useful Post:
deepzero (06-25-2018)
  #44  
Old 06-28-2018, 15:38
pp2 pp2 is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 59
Rept. Given: 1
Rept. Rcvd 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks Given: 1
Thanks Rcvd at 16 Times in 12 Posts
pp2 Reputation: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by sf42 View Post
The problem is that I have no idea which builds include private symbols!
When you build any program or driver, usually compiler creates PDB file, but, there are two options, when linker writes it: /PDB - usual (normal) debug information and /PDBSTRIPPED - do not include some type, class and function information for private symbols. By default, all symbols are visible, but again, you can restrict this by only exported (public) symbols.

I presume, that PDB files for NT kernel for example, if they are really full, should by 2-3 times bigger, than usual ones. Checked builds - are not builds with private symbols, but contain different assertions and checks (so they are called "checked"), they are useful for hard debugging, but do not contain much additional information about kernel internals.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GitHub Source Code Leak atom0s Source Code 2 11-08-2020 09:30
NT 3.5 source code full leak? WhoCares General Discussion 10 06-13-2020 14:55
iOS iBoot Source code leak - Probably termed as the biggest leak in the history foosaa Source Code 13 03-14-2018 01:02


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 12:23.


Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX, chessgod101
( 1998 - 2024 )