Exetools  

Go Back   Exetools > General > General Discussion

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-31-2003, 21:45
donneraza
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy the unbreakable armadillo !!!

First I've tryed to apply Ricardo methode with Oly to unpack armadillo packed

prog.

I bp on WriteProcessMemory and I've seen that BytesToWrite = 2 ( only).And
any thing similar to Ricardo great tut.

Secondo I've applyed Crusader approach .

I bpx on SetProcessWorkingSetSize and Hitting F12 on SI, I land here:


01B76005 8B351852B801 MOV ESI,[01B85218]
01B7600B 50 PUSH EAX
01B7600C FFD6 CALL ESI ==>First call to

SetProcessWorkingSetSize
01B7600E A11819B901 MOV EAX,[01B91918]
01B76013 3BC3 CMP EAX,EBX
01B76015 7407 JZ 01B7601E
01B76017 57 PUSH EDI
01B76018 57 PUSH EDI
01B76019 FF7004 PUSH DWORD PTR [EAX+04]
01B7601C FFD6 CALL ESI ==>second call to

SetProcessWorkingSetSize
01B7601E 8B45F0 MOV EAX,[EBP-10]
01B76021 5F POP EDI
01B76022 5E POP ESI
01B76023 5B POP EBX
01B76024 C9 LEAVE

I can't find any call EDI

And then the prog. is exit with the following error
" General extraction error : location ES1 "

Tertio I've used the Dillodumper255 unpacker. The target prog display that
it need a valid key ( normaly it does not because it is demo prog in default

mode ). Ignoring this, I let dillo continue and launch ImpRec to reconstruct the

IAT tables. Finally I execute the Dump prog it crash ( try to read a bad

location).

I've localised where the decrypte/encrypte routine is. And i've tryed to skip

the encrypte part by patching but it crash also the prog.

After all these, is there anyone who can give some help and advices to break

this unbreakable one. Thanks for all reply who can lead me to the good solution.
Regards
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-01-2003, 02:59
Lunar_Dust
 
Posts: n/a
SetProcessWorkingSetsize doesn't work anymore in newer Armadillo versions. They moved that API to a different location now. I think they moved it at 3.01 and above.

The code that jumps to the OEP is still a call EDI.

The file could possibly have nanomites in it, which even trying DilloDumper will not fix.

-Lunar
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-01-2003, 04:41
Squidge's Avatar
Squidge Squidge is offline
Drunken Squirrel
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 412
Rept. Given: 4
Rept. Rcvd 9 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Rcvd at 6 Times in 6 Posts
Squidge Reputation: 9
One quick way to check for Nanomites. Load the dumped program into Ollydbg and run it. When it crashes, Olly will tell you why it crashed, if you look at the line just above EIP this will tell you whether or not it's nanomites. An INT 3 there is a definite sign of nanomite infestation.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-02-2003, 13:34
donneraza
 
Posts: n/a
Launching the dumpeg prog with OllyDg It start with this warning

" Module "Dumped_prog" has entry point ouutside the code ( as specified in the PE header). Maybe this file is self-extracting or self-modifing. ..."

And then continuing runing the prog with F9 it stop with "
" Debugged program was unable to process exception" and it exit.

Sometime I've an " access violation when reading [04172434] " and exit.

If try unpack it with Dillodumper25 not with DilloDumper255 the dumped-prog was not crashed but it stop with " ... invalid key ...". So What the diff. between the dillo_25 and dillo_255 ? Why the dillo unpacker triggered the need of key even if in realty the aramadillo packed original prog does not ?

Regards
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +8. The time now is 04:18.


Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX, chessgod101
( 1998 - 2024 )