Exetools  

Go Back   Exetools > General > General Discussion

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #76  
Old 01-11-2013, 20:27
swlepus swlepus is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 23
Rept. Given: 6
Rept. Rcvd 5 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Rcvd at 6 Times in 5 Posts
swlepus Reputation: 5
VMProtect is the best uncrackable protection without hardware.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 01-16-2013, 14:02
esimsoft
 
Posts: n/a
I think flexlm with ECC is the best.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 04-11-2013, 13:28
iconstart iconstart is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 21
Rept. Given: 0
Rept. Rcvd 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks Given: 10
Thanks Rcvd at 10 Times in 9 Posts
iconstart Reputation: 1
snpslmd.exe daemon
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 04-23-2013, 03:16
c4p0ne's Avatar
c4p0ne c4p0ne is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: n/a
Posts: 83
Rept. Given: 1
Rept. Rcvd 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks Given: 2
Thanks Rcvd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
c4p0ne Reputation: 1
Post

My vote goes toward VMProtect.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 04-23-2013, 04:32
user1 user1 is offline
Family
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: OUT
Posts: 1,041
Rept. Given: 547
Rept. Rcvd 120 Times in 67 Posts
Thanks Given: 695
Thanks Rcvd at 566 Times in 337 Posts
user1 Reputation: 41
WmProtect can be unpacked with LCF-AT Vmprotect 1.xx - 2.xx Ultra Unpacker V1.0.... thanks to LCF-AT.
Reply With Quote
  #81  
Old 04-23-2013, 05:09
data-snipper data-snipper is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 10
Rept. Given: 4
Rept. Rcvd 5 Times in 1 Post
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Rcvd at 1 Time in 1 Post
data-snipper Reputation: 5
mix your experience in RE with Coding then you will make an uncrackable soft :d
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 04-23-2013, 21:01
p4r4d0x p4r4d0x is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoCOg8ZzUfg
Posts: 142
Rept. Given: 95
Rept. Rcvd 21 Times in 11 Posts
Thanks Given: 396
Thanks Rcvd at 146 Times in 64 Posts
p4r4d0x Reputation: 21
starforce the best for me and too hard ! also i will keep it private
But One day a friend Told me this : What ever is executed IS CAN BE CRACKED (he have cracked ZENON 7 !
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 04-24-2013, 06:02
wilson bibe wilson bibe is offline
VIP
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 492
Rept. Given: 489
Rept. Rcvd 439 Times in 180 Posts
Thanks Given: 853
Thanks Rcvd at 176 Times in 112 Posts
wilson bibe Reputation: 400-499 wilson bibe Reputation: 400-499 wilson bibe Reputation: 400-499 wilson bibe Reputation: 400-499 wilson bibe Reputation: 400-499
Hi p4r4d0x
"What ever is executed IS CAN BE CRACKED"; not always.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 04-24-2013, 16:41
mcp mcp is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 73
Rept. Given: 4
Rept. Rcvd 12 Times in 11 Posts
Thanks Given: 7
Thanks Rcvd at 47 Times in 35 Posts
mcp Reputation: 12
For all practical concerns, the statement "Whatever is executed can be cracked" is correct. However, from a more theoretical perspective, a protection based on homomorphic encryption is in principle not crackable, only its input and output are observable. For specific cases this can yield an uncrackable (i.e. not understable) mechanism.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 04-24-2013, 16:47
WRP WRP is offline
Family
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 184
Rept. Given: 32
Rept. Rcvd 52 Times in 33 Posts
Thanks Given: 200
Thanks Rcvd at 231 Times in 105 Posts
WRP Reputation: 52
Protection builded on WhiteBox technology
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 04-25-2013, 14:33
nodongle
 
Posts: n/a
where i can get software + medicine?
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 04-25-2013, 14:43
giv's Avatar
giv giv is offline
VIP
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Romania
Posts: 1,657
Rept. Given: 801
Rept. Rcvd 1,283 Times in 561 Posts
Thanks Given: 226
Thanks Rcvd at 562 Times in 240 Posts
giv Reputation: 1100-1299 giv Reputation: 1100-1299 giv Reputation: 1100-1299 giv Reputation: 1100-1299 giv Reputation: 1100-1299 giv Reputation: 1100-1299 giv Reputation: 1100-1299 giv Reputation: 1100-1299 giv Reputation: 1100-1299
For your concern ... what is made by man hands will be "broken" also by mans hand.
So i think is no "uncrackable" protection.
Just hard to bypass or reverse.
It just require lots of knowledge and hard work.
All software protections are down at the moment.
Most of the hardware protections can be emulated, bypassed.
I think the private solutions for the protections exists in every passionate reverser.
Most of the strong protections solutions are kept in private so from here the impresion that a protection is "uncrackable".
I think the discusion is futile.
The thread subject is, IMHO, what is the hardest software protection not "uncrackable".
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 04-25-2013, 16:45
mcp mcp is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 73
Rept. Given: 4
Rept. Rcvd 12 Times in 11 Posts
Thanks Given: 7
Thanks Rcvd at 47 Times in 35 Posts
mcp Reputation: 12
Quote:
For your concern ... what is made by man hands will be "broken" also by mans hand.
Well, as I said that's not technically correct. Counter examples include homomorphic encryption which is provably secure with respect to what information can be extracted from the code using static/dynamics analysis.
Also, take crypto systems such as RSA or AES, those were built "by man" as well. By your logic you should be able to break any instance of it. That's obviously not true.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 04-25-2013, 17:16
Syoma Syoma is offline
reverse engineer
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 338
Rept. Given: 35
Rept. Rcvd 77 Times in 50 Posts
Thanks Given: 15
Thanks Rcvd at 78 Times in 51 Posts
Syoma Reputation: 77
Quote:
RSA or AES
Depends on the time and resources only. They are secure enough from the current point of view. BTW, for practical reasons RSA le 512 is insecure. AES is also not secure in some cases, including pure WBAES.
homomorphic encryption looks nice as theory, but there are no existing implementations.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 04-25-2013, 18:04
mcp mcp is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 73
Rept. Given: 4
Rept. Rcvd 12 Times in 11 Posts
Thanks Given: 7
Thanks Rcvd at 47 Times in 35 Posts
mcp Reputation: 12
Quote:
Depends on the time and resources only. They are secure enough from the current point of view. BTW, for practical reasons RSA le 512 is insecure. AES is also not secure in some cases, including pure WBAES.
Sure, but his general statement is not true for all practical concerns. Or to put it differently: I can construct an instance which you won't be able to crack within the lifetime of our universe.

Quote:
homomorphic encryption looks nice as theory, but there are no existing implementations.
There are libraries (just google for it), but I haven't seen an implementation that was used for a protection mechanism.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
When use "vendor defined encryption routines", how to set daemon related part? bridgeic General Discussion 6 01-22-2015 11:35
Wlscgen: Are "Vendor Id" and "Developer Id" different ? Numega Softice General Discussion 6 02-12-2007 18:12


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 22:18.


Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX, chessgod101
( 1998 - 2024 )