#1
|
|||
|
|||
Windows 11: TPMs and Digital Sovereignty
https://secret.club/2021/06/28/windows11-tpms.html
There is a concern that Microsoft wants to lock down and control the whole PC platform with their Windows 11 TPM requirement. What do you think? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Linux is still a viable alternative. But I have been saying for years to enjoy unrestricted access to your PC because it will go away at some point. Fortunately there are techniques to recover the TPM keys but they are laboratory equipment level and require advanced tools.
This is just the first step. Wait until the hardware refuses to boot a non-approved signed OS. Even Linux will fall in line at some point or only run on inferior hardware. The Wild West of PC and internet freedom are coming to a fast end. And year by year we literally witness this demise. On the bright side, reversing skills will be in higher demand and perhaps unlocking techniques will become quite profitable. Lab equipment is expensive, it would be nice if labs would rent equipment or the whole laboratory space for periods of time. Otherwise, it would certainly be nice to be good friends with such a technician |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Microsoft has confirmed already that you can install without the proper TPM setup but "it may not work as expected". Would assume it'd prevent things like additional sign-in options with NFC tags/cards, bio data (ie. fingerprints) and so on to not work as before. As well as probably not allowing drive encryption to work anymore.
Outside of that though, people already bypassed a lot of the installers other limitations for hardware requirements by just altering the ISO with Windows 10's installer media files for certain things. It'll fix the checks it has for other junk and allow you to install regardless.
__________________
Personal Projects Site: https://atom0s.com |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
What can you do with Windows 10 or 11 and can't do with Windows 7 ?
Regardless of the stupid "This software requires Windows 10" message that I see more these days for unreasonable reasons, for example I had a software running like a charm for years on Windows 7, then the developers decided to use python 3.9 with the software which for unknown reasons doesn't work on Windows 7 ! I still can't see why people should always upgrade to the latest OS just because it has some new themes and wallpapers. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Kurapica For This Useful Post: | ||
niculaita (06-29-2021) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Most of the forced attempts at getting people to upgrade have just been for a means of new monetization. Since Windows 10 is 'free', Microsoft's goal was to get as many people onto it as possible to collect telemetry data instead, which is worth way more than the typical $100 for the OS.
This is generally done with misleading advertisements saying that systems 'cant' support Windows 10 when they perfectly can. For example, Microsoft added installer blocks to the OS's to try and force people to use Windows 10 on newer processors in a deal with Intel. So any chip that was made more recently would get an unsupported error and be 'forced' into using Windows 10. (The community has since made patches to get around this nonsense and allow older installs again.) However, in that same deal, a lot of hardware manufacturers are in agreement to no longer make drivers for anything prior to Windows 10 on newer devices/hardware. They also attempted to prevent certain frameworks/libraries from working on past versions of Windows or refused to update things further than a certain point to try and limit what people can do if they are still on Windows 7. (ie. Some games won't run by default, DirectX 12 isn't supported natively, newer .NET Frameworks aren't supported, etc. but all have varying community patches to allow/run etc.) Ultimately, comes down to the user and what they feel is worth the effort to deal with all the workarounds required to keep using older operating systems. Windows 11 has already tried to do a similar tactic to force people into buying new hardware again with a non-legit requirement of newer CPUs and a TPM 2.0 module, both of which are not actually required. It's doing nothing but creating more e-waste at the expense of the customer only, just to line the pockets of all involved in the agreements to try and get people to buy newer generation hardware. It's basically them creating forced obsolescence to keep people spending money. Who knows how much new telemetry shit is baked into Windows 11 too.
__________________
Personal Projects Site: https://atom0s.com |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Unfortunately, locked down hardware and appstores are in the convenience interest of both companies and most standard customers.
Well, it was fun while it lasted! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
How to install Windows 11 without TPM 2.0 and Secure Boot
language=Russian Code:
https://tunecom.ru/windows-11/993-ustanovit-windows-11-bez-tpm.html Code:
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Ftunecom.ru%2Fwindows-11%2F993-ustanovit-windows-11-bez-tpm.html Code:
https://tunecom.ru/uploads/files/2021-06/Bypass.zip |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Thanks for the info but why implement TMP 2 secureboot that anyone can disable with a registry keys?it will be be removed on final or updated version for sure.
__________________
I like this forum! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
thanks by advance.
__________________
I like this forum! |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Code:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGuQ4SZVSWc&ab_channel=Jaguarek62 As an example, here is a project of mine that bypasses an application's limitation from running on anything but Windows 10. This is for Elgato's StreamDeck hardware/software. Elgato has the installer limited to only work on Windows 10 and also prevents the app from running properly in multiple ways. They attempt to block the app from working if it does not see its on Windows 10, it also does not show any plugins in the available list based on the OS information. This is limited based on them using a newer version of Qt that is made for Windows 10 and also has its own code in place to check for a Windows 10 machine and not work for anything else. My project emulates some of the API calls to fake which info is returned to make the software assume its Windows 10 and so on. Code:
https://github.com/atom0s/ElgatoLegacy
__________________
Personal Projects Site: https://atom0s.com |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Usually MS always tries to make complicated API and programming details with incompatibilities to justify and force these issues. And other projects like QT having special Win10 builds, etc. The changes are superficial or trivial, but it creates forward compatibility issues.
You have to wonder how many "features" are just forward compatibility tricks to force new DRM into Windows. Like atom0s says, emulating a lot of this is usually possible, depending on how well the complicated it. Probably a reason they redid the video card model in Win10 as well. I imagine they will leave the TPM 2 stuff disable-able for testing, as putting in that requirement and the processor requirements would dramatically reduce the quality of the testing. They will probably initially release even with it easily able to be removed. Then after a year when enough people switch to Windows 11, they will enforce it. Microsoft usually does things slowly and steadily, not all dissimilar to the way powerful clever governments erode power from the people inch by inch over a drawn out period of time. But everyone sees the writing on the wall. I'll probably stick with Windows 10 as long as possible, so long as it is under support at least. |
The Following User Says Thank You to chants For This Useful Post: | ||
uranus64 (07-03-2021) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Oh yes probably,i didn't thought about this point,let the pc world install win11 ,despite them and when million users are using it(infected) then switching off ability to remove TMP
__________________
I like this forum! |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
For the time being, it looks like Microsoft is 'somewhat' listening to the backlash in regards to the requirements, specifically the TPM 2.0 requirement for Windows 11. The new insider build has the requirement removed for now but they tried to justify its use in a new blog post. However, I think the post really helps show how out of touch they are in regards to why they are trying to require it in the first place with quotes like this:
Quote:
New requirements are listed here for now along with their reasonings behind them: Code:
https://blogs.windows.com/windows-insider/2021/06/28/update-on-windows-11-minimum-system-requirements/ Stuff like this being on-by-default and used by non-computer literate people just means more telemetry data for MS to collect and bank off of. Their requirements aren't made for security, or stability, it's entirely based around money.
__________________
Personal Projects Site: https://atom0s.com |
The Following User Says Thank You to atom0s For This Useful Post: | ||
Kurapica (07-01-2021) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Would personally bet that they have no actual data to back up those numbers and base it on a large sample of bias data. The main places that would even benefit from things like TPM 2.0, secure boot, full drive encryption, etc. are major companies/corps. that half the time are still running things like XP or Win7 because they wont spend the money to upgrade their backends to anything newer. A lot of them also do not want Win10 spying on their internal information/trade secrets, regardless of how many times MS wants to claim they aren't 'spying' on that kind of info. Home users have literally no interest in those features for the 99%. The 1% are the nerd/neckbeards that have homelabs and think their side hobbies are targeted by foreign hackers lol. If they had real numbers to back up their claims, they'd share and post them, but instead like every other company that lies, they just throw out articles that try to fear people into upgrades.
__________________
Personal Projects Site: https://atom0s.com |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ARK for WINDOWS x64: WIN64AST(with digital signature) | exeu | x64 OS | 1 | 05-01-2013 07:12 |
VATARI - Digital String Technology | imagin | General Discussion | 3 | 12-05-2006 03:32 |
Digital signature in network protocol | nine | General Discussion | 3 | 07-25-2003 23:46 |