#1
|
|||
|
|||
Comers & Goners in software protection
Hi there,
this post only to have in one page all of the most used software protection developers, just as as a benchmark of who's left and who's gone. As far as I have been able to see that great deal of software protection application that used to be alive in the 2000-2010 decade have mostly deceased, maybe because of the efforts needed to keep the protection valid and the change in licensing needs with the advent of cloud. If someone would like to help, then the list could simply be updated. P.S. The following list includes only wrapping protectors or at least something with a Tool, not DLL or free source code ones (VBOLock, TrialX, Activelock etc...) nor the accademic ones. |------------|-----------------|-------------------|---------------------| | Name | Developer | Software Status |Company Status | |------------|-----------------|-------------------|---------------------| | ACProtect | Anticrack | Dead | Dead | | Armadillo | Silicon Realms | Dead | Dead | | ASProtect | Alexey Solod. | Operative (SKE) | Operative (Starforce)| | Crypkey | Crypkey | Operative | Operative | | Enigma | Vladimir Sukhov | Operative | Operative | | Execryptor | Strongbit | Dead | Dead | | Interlok | Pace AP | Operative (iLok) | Operative | | Obsidium | Martin Tofall | Operative | Operative | | PC Guard | Sofpro | Operative | Operative | | Protection +| Softwarekey |Operative | Operative | | Safe Cast | Macrovision | Dead | Operative (Flexera) | | Sales Agent| Release Soft | Dead | Dead | | SDProtector | ??? | Dead | Dead | | Softlocx | Bit-Arts | Dead | Dead | | Softsentry | Twenty | Dead | Dead | | SVKP | Pavol Cerven | Dead | Dead | | Timelok | Preview Systems| Dead | Dead | | VBox | Preview/Ealadin | Dead | Dead | | Visual Prot | Visage Soft | Dead | Operative | | VM Protect | VMPSoft | Operative | Operative | | XProtector | XProtector | Operative (Tmd/WL)| Operative (Oreans) | Apart from the companies that have been bought/other financial gimmicks, the first thing I notice is that what survived is mostly using VMs and what failed, failed for various reasons, but didn't have the time to develop one, so it seems that to survive the others using a VM is somehow mandatory. What do you think? Are there other protectors to add to the list? What do you believe have been the motives of the great development first and subsequent fade out after of most software protections? Last edited by TmC; 10-25-2019 at 08:18. |
The Following User Says Thank You to TmC For This Useful Post: | ||
nimaarek (10-29-2019) |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Not sure if you want to include things that were used to protect games but:
Code:
|------------|------------------------|-------------------|---------------------| | Name | Developer | Software Status | Company Status | |------------|------------------------|-------------------|---------------------| | SafeDisc | Macrovision | Dead | Operative (TiVo) | | SecuROM | Sony DADC | Dead | Operative (Sony) | | StarForce | StarForce Technologies | Operative | Operative | |------------|------------------------|-------------------|---------------------|
__________________
Personal Projects Site: https://atom0s.com |
The Following User Says Thank You to atom0s For This Useful Post: | ||
nimaarek (10-29-2019) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I was thinking about that...if people like it we can also add that.
For a small ammount of time Bit-Arts too produced a CD protection tool used in Age of Empires III if I recall correctly. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
safecast was a very very diluted version of safedisk with one exported api in the dll to check to do the checking.. it was trivial to bypass...
securom isnt officially dead either, sony still have it, and denuvo had access to it (unsure if they still do as they then did denuvo x86 which they didnt have before) - but its not dead per se... same with starforce.. afaik its still going strong in the russian and asian areas.. just not in the euro and american ones |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
think the driver is optional now and yeh the driver stuff was pretty much the kiss of death for starforce in most of the western countries.. so there could well be regional variation in the protection used on some products
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
StarForce is still going but is very rarely used anymore in the gaming industry, at least with anything that comes to the western world. There has been a release here and there that has included it, last I recall was a game from UbiSoft which quickly ditched it after massive problems with the "protection" and potential rootkit dangers. Most of their customer base now is Russian companies. Think the biggest in terms of gaming that people would recognize currently is Mail.ru due to them currently acquiring a license to run the new MMOARPG Lost Ark from Korea.
__________________
Personal Projects Site: https://atom0s.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
umm SecuRom never was a company - the company was sony dadc, digitalworks was just the division, virtualfactory before that, sony retained the rights to securom, that much i can assure you, even though its barely maintained or indeed used anymore..
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Starforce driver is dead because it conflicts with Patchguard (they used interrupt hooking which is not allowed on modern Windows)
Securom was offered as protection by Denuvo for 32-bit games when they didn't develop the x86 version yet |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kagi Software Protection | Nukacola | General Discussion | 0 | 04-08-2005 00:13 |
What is the best software protection? | FractalizeR | General Discussion | 35 | 08-19-2003 13:21 |