I quite like 7z personally, it is free at least and will not cause trouble when using in a production environment.
7z offers functionalties that is comparable with winrar and winzip.
I think one feature these compression ware need to support is to mount the zipped file as iso images, such as the function of winmount.
Quote:
Originally Posted by atom0s
Something I've always wondered is why people still use WinRAR as their main archiving tool of choice. 7z has been around for a while now and has proven to have a better compression ratio on pretty much everything. So what are your opinions on sticking with .rar instead of moving to .7z or a different archive type?
|
02-24-2015, 00:53
Threaded Mode